This article contains links to products or services we love and that we may make a small commission from.

Here’s why the Fujifilm XF 35mm f2 lens is a must-have addition to your kit bag

The XF 35mm f2 lens was Fuji’s upgrade from the XF 35mm f1.4 version. It was released back in 2015 and has proven itself to be a solid lens that deserves a spot in anyone’s arsenal.

The older f1.4 was always a great lens, so when the f2 was released people wondered if it could really top it. Well it did and here’s why.

Focal Length

The XF range of lenses are all designed for mirrorless bodies with APS-C sized sensors, so to take that into consideration you have to times the focal length of your lens by 1.6 to get its actual focal length. 35mm x 1.6 = 56mm and what is every photographer’s favourite focal length? The one that they would choose if they could only use one lens for the rest of their life? Most likely a 50mm.

56mm/50mm, tomato/tomato? It’s close enough is what I’m trying to say.

It’s the focal length that the human eye sees in so you get images with minimal distortion and everything is nicely proportionate.

The XF 35mm f2 on a X-T10 body

Fujifilm do a 50mm f2 which looks almost identical (build wise) to the 35mm f2 but after you factor the crop in you get an equivalent focal length of 80mm which is too tight for an all purpose and versatile lens, at least for me anyway. Great for portraits though.


The old 35mm f1.4 was a fantastic lens, and still is especially if you need that extra stop of exposure. If having a max aperture of f1.4 is crucial to you and you really can’t make do with f2 then I highly suggest you get the f1.4 version, but if that isn’t a deal breaker for you then the f2 version is better in almost every other way.

When both lenses are stopped down to f2 the new 35mm wins every time when it comes to sharpness, which is no small feat especially considering f2 is at its widest. At f8 and higher it’s hard to tell the difference between old and new. Paired with something like the X-Pro2 or X-T2 this lens is going to produce amazingly sharp and crispy images, but even with one of Fuji’s entry level cameras like the X-T20 this lens is going to amaze you.

Build quality

Short answer is that it’s perfect. Like most Fuji products the thing feels like it would survive getting run over by a bulldozer. It’s an all metal design and as it’s also weather sealed I think you would have a hard time damaging it. It feels quality, the aperture and focus rings are firm but easily adjusted. The aperture ring confidently clicks into place every 1/3 of a stop and the whole thing generally feels great to use.

Left: 35mm f2 / Right: 35mm f1.4

The f2 version is considerable smaller than the f1.4 version and perfectly compliments the small form factor of Fuji’s X-Series range of mirrorless cameras.


The f2 version comes in at around $400 and the f1.4 around $600. So when all you’re really loosing by buying the newer f2 version is 1 stop of exposure you have to ask yourself is 1 extra stop worth around $200 to you? If it isn’t then go for the f2, it’s a great lens and you won’t be disappointed.

For $400 dollars you are getting great value for money, you’re getting a pro-level lens in terms of image quality. With other brands you could end up paying a lot more to achieve the image quality this lens produces.

One of Fuji’s best landscape lenses is the XF 10-24mm f4. It’s a workhorse that should be in any Fuji shooter’s bag.


My 35mm f2 is constantly stuck to the end of my X-T10, it’s THE perfect lens for street photography but also does a great job at being an all-purpose lens. It’s just as sharp if not sharper than the f1.4, it’s autofocus is faster, it’s smaller, it’s weather resistant and, oh yeah, it’s cheaper.

If you’re looking to get into prime lenses then the XF 35mm f2 is a great, affordable, choice.


Build Quality/Design
Autofocus Speed
Hi, I'm Charlie. Originally from the UK, but brought up in Spain, I'm a travel photographer and passionate writer. For the last few years, I've been lucky enough to turn my passion for travel photography and writing into my full-time job. It allows me to travel the world doing what I love. A fun fact about me is that I'm also a qualified scuba diving instructor so in my spare time when I'm not behind a camera or laptop, you'll probably find me underwater somewhere!


    • Hi, personally I almost never use this lens for landscape photography. It’s just not the right focal length. For landscapes I would go either wide-angle or telephoto. If it’s your first lens specifically for landscapes, I would recommend going with a wide-angle like the XF 10-24mm f/4. If you want a good telephoto lens for landscapes then the XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 is great.

  1. You are a bit “off” on your explanation of the crop-factor for FujiFilm APS-C-sensors:
    When you say ” …you have to times the focal length of your lens by 1.6 to get its actual focal length …” is not quite correct.

    It is 1.5 (yes, One Point Five). Canon has a crop-factor of 1.6 – but Sony, Nikon, Pentax and FujiFilm all have 1.5 as crop factor. Not that it makes much difference, but onev you write an “experts” view on anything, you really should make your homework …
    Best regards,
    Walter from Norway


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here